The humanitarian crisis in Syria has recently been dubbed the worst of our time. More than four years have passed since catastrophe ensued and virtually no progress has been made toward a resolution. Civilians are slaughtered, tortured, and detained daily by the Syrian government. However, the advent of ISIS and their expanding power and influence over the region has decreased global concern for crimes committed by and on behalf of the Assad regime. Even our own communities have drifted into a state of reserve. Mass protests, campaigns, and social media activism devoted to raising awareness about these crimes have lulled. The majority of activists have shifted their efforts to focus on treating the symptoms of the war, rather than addressing its root causes. Certainly, the lack of political action around this crisis is beyond demoralizing; however, by failing to sustain our protest against the Assad regime, we are inadvertently allowing the international community to legitimize its actions.
This past May, Amnesty International published a report detailing a small fraction of the human rights abuses and violations of international law committed predominantly by the Syrian government in Aleppo. Their findings are unfathomable. Throughout the report, the organization repeatedly emphasizes that the Syrian population is suffering “unthinkable atrocities.” Homes, schools, hospitals, aid centers, and religious buildings are attacked indiscriminately by the Syrian army. The majority of these crimes involve the use of barrel bombs, a crude form weaponry consisting of oil canisters filled with explosives, fuel, metal fragments and even chlorine gas.
Syrians interviewed by Amnesty describe the feeling of constantly being on the brink of death, “always nervous, always worried, always looking to the sky.” More than 220,000 Syrians have been murdered since the onset of the war. Eleven million, formerly half of the country’s population, have been uprooted from their homes. Of these individuals, 7.6 million are stuck within the country’s borders without means to escape or continue living. This year, more than 11,000 people have been murdered thus far, and the vast majority by the Assad regime.
Reports exposing the government’s various atrocities have helped garner sympathy for its victims but failed to provoke sufficient political intervention to end to its crimes. Moreover, the international community’s lack of decisive action has cemented a “culture of impunity;” the United States government has particularly aggregated the war more than it has assisted in facilitating conflict transformation. When ISIS began making gains in Syria less than a year ago, the Obama administration authorized air strikes against the militant group in an effort to “hunt down terrorists who threaten America.” Incidentally, this decision put our war efforts in unity with those of Assad, causing an abrupt change in our view of the regime from a passive adversary to a potential ally. Since then, many Western leaders have implied a commitment to this stance, stating that the solution to the Syrian crisis “will likely include some elements of the regime.”
Despite the numerous violations of international law and war crimes it has committed over the past four years, our national leaders chose to ignore the Assad regime as it desecrated Syria. It was not until the very moment the crisis became so out of hand and it began to infringe on our national interests that our foreign policy officials finally decided to take action. Our apathy to human suffering has cornered us into dealing with the devil. Had we afforded some semblance of compassion prior to the advent of the ISIS, we might have found dispositions in the region held toward our nation to be a bit less hostile.
Additionally, the mainstream media narrative has chosen to focus almost exclusively on the so-called imminent threat of an “Islamist takeover” by ISIS, rendering the ongoing atrocities committed by the Syrian government virtually invisible. Have we have forgotten that the Assad regime has been reigning terror over civilians for more than twice as long as ISIS has been even remotely lethal? Certainly this so-called Islamic State has committed ghastly atrocities and should be halted in efforts. But to be very clear, their interest and ability to inflict terror on those living in Iraq and Syria is exponentially greater than it is on those living in America. Western powers tout their intentions for peace and stability in the region, yet the only time they deem a humanitarian crisis fit for intervention is when they feel their national interests are threatened. In the words of Stephen Hawking, “What is happening in Syria is an abomination. Where is our sense of collective justice?”
Fortunately, many people have been organizing various forms of relief for Syrian victims since the onset of the war. Among these initiatives are Zeitouna, a therapy wellness camp that seeks to assist the psycho-social needs of refugees living in Turkey, and NuDay Syria, a humanitarian organization that provides aid for women and children with no male breadwinners in their families. Certainly these types of programs are invaluable and should be developed further; however, we cannot let their existence reel us into complicity with the ongoing crimes of the Syrian government. The efforts we dedicate toward helping Syria should not focus solely on mending the lives of escapees until the Assad regime ceases persecuting those still living in the region. We must continue to prioritize building and strengthening grassroots movements that help the Syrian people attain their autonomy (see Students Organize for Syria).
The Palestine solidarity movement is perhaps one of the best models we have for developing a sustainable movement that will yield real change in Syria. When Gaza was under attack one year ago, we organized mass political actions against the Israeli government until it surrendered to international pressures and ended its assault. Of course, the conflict in Syria is vastly different and arguably more complicated. Our government’s common enemy in region with the regime certainly makes advocating for its deposition more difficult, but this challenge should not discourage us from trying.
History has proved time and time again that when we put our national interests above the values of human rights, we suffer the consequences. Efforts to attain genuine peace in Syria, Iraq and other countries affected by ISIS and Assad’s regime will not prevail until the principles of respect and dignity for human life penetrate our nation’s foreign policy. When world leaders reject this notion, it is our civic and religious duty to bring these values back into their consciousness and to fight for Syrian people’s steadfast right to actualize their dreams of peace, prosperity and political freedom.
—
Written by Nour Azzouz
Seems there’s no love for Muslim countries even from the so-called other brotherly Muslim nations.
well, those so-called Muslim nations are dictatorships, I hope that this explains a lot to you.
Dictatorship is no excuse. They are implementing Sharia laws. If you consider Sharia laws as dictatorship then it’s another matter. Besides, the oil-income bearing Muslim countries are the biggest contributor of Zakat money to the other Muslim countries so that they remain devout Muslim and subservient to Saudi Arabian religion. It’s time that they adopt those very same Muslims as their obligation too if they really think in Islam.
what sharia laws? all those dictatorships implement Federal laws, yeah they give it some “islamic” theme to silent people but that’s just about it, it’s not sharia laws, and no, a true islamic state is not a dictatorships since people pick the leader and have no obligation to obey him if he is not obeying god and the prophet.
“the oil-income” publicly and officially half of that (OK, 49% of it) goes to the foreign companies that those dictatorships made contracts with to protect their thrones, those companies are owned by the foreign countries that invaded them.
Zakat money? well that is indeed in sharia law, but not in those federal laws, even Saudi Arabia -which you might thought is islamic- doesn’t force anyone to give his Zakat money.
also just to clarify this: Saudi Arabia isn’t like a holy state to us, it’s not like the Vatican to Catholics, and it’s king isn’t like the pope to us.
but now let’s get to the first statement that you made: “Dictatorship is no excuse.” you don’t seem to understand what I mean, which is: those are dictatorships that the west installed when they where “finished” with invading our countries, those dictatorships couldn’t care less about the suffering of Muslims inside or outside them, in fact it’s quite the opposite, they want their nations (the people) to see how terrible a revolution would end up so that they can guarantee that the same would never happen in their countries.
What is Islamic matter primarily with the people living in those Islamic countries. If the people are satisfied that they’re following the Islamic ruling then, if they are under some dictator or some democratic set-up doesn’t matter. As long as people in these countries like Saudi Arabia, Oman, Bahrain, UAE think that they are under the Islamic rule and doesn’t have much qualms about it then it’s hard to explain any other form of govt. to them as they’re used to that sort of govt. for ages.
It seems you’re not from these Arabic countries so you’re complaining about them but it doesn’t matter to the people/citizen of these countries as they don’t care for your views. Most of these rich Arab countries consider the other Muslim nations citizens as some beggars living on their doles or don’t recognize them even if they are Muslims, they’re just converts so no voice matter of them. You’re born to serve them for your doles and religiosity. You’re good to serve them as fodder for wars they indulge, you’re good to serve them for building their grand towers, you’re good to serve them in their homes as servants and drivers but you’re not good to sit next to them as another Muslim.
Regarding letting in refugees, a minister in the Kuwait govt. did make a right statement that these Syrian people aren’t good enough workers to toil in the sun, nor are they good enough for serving them in the wars they fighting so no welcome for them. They don’t more Mullahs for their mosques, nor they want charitable colonies infested with refugees so as to provide them all the necessary benefits as provisioned under international conventions just because of the fact that they didn’t provide good enough facilities to the migrant workers from other countries too. They live the life of slaves there so how could they give more beneficial life to the migrant refugees there.
the thing about 100+ years of dictatorship is that they start to brainwash people.
now they can’t brainwash everyone but they sure as hell did shut up everyone that speaks against them, if they can brainwash a small minority it could be enough for them as they’d put those in control, you’ve never seen what it’s like when some “royalty” person comes to some public place (for example a university) it feels like if you sneeze close to him (by close i mean 20 meters away which is as close as you can get with the way he’s surrounded by security wearing normal looking white -Arabic- clothes) you’d get shot in the head, and the worst part is that nobody will know about it, in one of the gulf countries when a recent fire took place in a building they shut down the internet for 30 whole minutes to figure out what the media shall say about it (which will affect how people discuss it).
I think that changes are in the offing in the ME region due to falling oil prices and thus the resultant dwindling of incomes. So many Arab countries will be forced to privatize and also enforce laws like sales tax, income tax, wealth tax and other plethora of taxes to the public. There will be no doles like the one earlier in Saudi Arabia in which the King handed out 100000 K’s to quarter of million $ to every Saudi citizen so that they can purchase new wife or indulge in merry-making. Gone are the days of indulgence, now the people are going to feel the pinch the hard way and thus, there will be a time when better administration is demanded. The castle were built on oil-incomes not on the intelligence and hard-work of citizenry. They will come down sooner rather than later.
“purchase new wife”?! i’m not sure if you meant to use this term or it was a misphrasing, I don’t know if you’re a Muslim or not but regardless let’s make it clear that Islam does not objectify women.
regarding the rest I mostly agree, however some of them gulf countries said that they got good plans for when the oil is gone, in some of them more than 70% of the economy is already independent from the oil industry, I guess only time will tell.
I’ve seen reports about the gift that King Salman gave to his countrymen on his coronation, maybe on some other site. Also seen the misuse of the money that involved, having a new wife at their disposal. Since having a wife in Saudi Kingdom is too expensive proposition, you gotta pay steeply then, the folks gone with it with their new found pay-check during that time. My comment was pointing in that stance. Regarding what Islam does or not permit, it’s all in your head, actual life doesn’t involve Islamic ideals or preaching. If you still live in the age of 7th century, it’s your choice, you can chose to remain blind to actual realities of the world.
“actual life doesn’t involve Islamic ideals or preaching.” how?
“If you still live in the age of 7th century” things were perfect until the west invaded Muslim countries two centuries ago, not back in the 7th century.
“you can chose to remain blind to actual realities of the world.” no, and actually we can see how the world keeps getting uglier and darker when Islam isn’t leading.
You’re just another Mullah, nothing else. This is not the world where you go on evangelism every-time you go online. You won’t find anyone interested in talking with you ever if you didn’t mend your ways. I don’t think I’m going to reply again with you. Either stop evangelizing about some religion as the other person just isn’t interested in that or forget having a discussion at all.
what mullah? actually is mullah even an arabic word? lol
and don’t tell me how to live my life, i’m just telling the truth.
if you are not interested in islamic things then why are you even on this website?
I make comments on various sites, it is none of your business to give certification to me either to give comments or not. I’m not telling anything about your life, you can talk to your Allah for discussion, not with people who doesn’t want to listen evangelical discourses.
“evangelical discourses” I only point the facts.
also, you came for this so blame no one but yourself.
You came for discussion with me, I didn’t ever called you. You can give evangelical discourse to your fellow Muslims, I’m no-one to you.
enough with your “evangelical discourse” bullshit to dismiss my arguments, i’m mentioning facts and they wouldn’t change regardless who i’m talking to.
That’s true Mullah of you.
how about you speak proper english and quite calling names you bully? what I said doesn’t change you motherfucker regardless whom i’m talking to, and your posts don’t even make sense, you didn’t make a point you just want to blame Islam and Muslims.