#MuslimGirlWoke

Twitter Calls out Muslims and Even Mizzou on #ParisAttacks

image-13-11-15-08-19-21
  • Standard Salvage

    The right attitude for the West to take about Islam is, “Believe what you like, since you have come after us with deadly force, we will eliminate you and all you stand for, all you cherish and all you consider holy by deadly force. You’ve asked for it.”

    What we need is to punish the perpetrators of terrorism, including those who finance actual perpetrators in their bad actions, and including states which sponsor by financing, supporting and encouraging bad actions. We need to fight a war against those states which are using state-sponsored terrorism to advance their cause of bringing the western world to its knees. We need to do this in such a way that the so-called “moderate” Muslims see that their cause is not only evil, but hopeless. This means that attacks must not be planned to spare the “moderate” Muslims.

    If the “moderate” Muslims want to preserve any parts of their religion, I think that we in the West must give them an ultimatum: if you don’t stop these insane practitioners of your so-called “peaceful” religion, we will do it for you, and there will be nothing left of it when we’re finished.

    That was the message to Japan in WWII, and that is what we need to do now with Islam. Nothing less than victory — meaning that we have to fight the war, the right war for the right reasons with the right goals, or this carnage will simply continue.

    • El Cid

      “That was the message to Japan in WWII, and that is what we need to do now with Islam.”
      Is nuking Islamic Civilization your message to Muslims? Here is a hint: Japan did not have nukes.

      Mull on that, it should focus your genocidal crusader psycho savage mind.

      • Standard Salvage

        “Japan did not have nukes.”
        If Japan had nukes they would have dropped them on us first. That is how war works little child. Your point exactly?

        Would you prefer we killed the Japanes with love and hugs?

        And so in your fairy tale land you would prefer the Japanese had won WW2?
        And you would prefer the Islamic State win this war so all women can be forced to wear head scarfs?
        Is that what you want?

        • El Cid

          You have NO answer. You missed the point. Your misplaced ad hominem, puerile sarcasm, lack of logic points to you…your intellectual deficit.

          • Standard Salvage

            “ad hominem”

            That was ad hominem? Really? What planet are you from where I committed an act of ad hominem attack? I have seen plenty worse in my day, even from you as I point out in a second.

            Answer? You posted an answer? I must have missed it.

            I already posted my rather lengthy answer at the beginning of this thread and you felt the need to reply to it on this comments page.

            Your answer? Actual ad hominem attacks on me like:

            “your genocidal crusader psycho savage mind”

            So look in the mirror buddy when it comes to “ad hominem”. Maybe you just wanted to use a big word as a way to somehow “destroy” my argument. Well you did nothing of the sort, you changed the subject to the ownership of nukes and by whom. How it is relevant to the argument evades me.

            I am just trying to preserve my life while the Islamic State tries to take it.

            What is your answer again? Why do not you post it for some scrutiny.

            Oh what is that? You have none.

          • El Cid

            You stated:“That was the message to Japan in WWII, and that is what we need to do now with Islam.”
            You threatened nuclear annihilation of Islamic Civilization. Any one who considers that, and I responded, is: ” “your genocidal crusader psycho savage mind”.

            But you missed my point. Japan did not have nukes so they were targeted by nukes, one after the other. That is what I told you explicitly.

            No one can take on Muslim warriors with boots on the ground. No one has and won. And no one ever will. Islamic Civilization now has nukes. Pakistan has full spectrum deterrence. Enough to take out the planet if need be.

            Pakistan has declared that if ever a nuke is used on any Muslim country then Pakistan will respond with all of its formidable might.

            Pakistan’s nuclear umbrella protects the whole of the Muslim world from such a strike by anyone. Further, Pakistan has reserved its preemptive first strike option as a deterrent.

            Now I have spoon fed you. Do you get it “little child” or is a baby bottle more your thing.

          • Standard Salvage

            Whew, for a second I thought maybe you had an answer to all of this since you are criticizing mine, but you don’t.

            “You threatened nuclear annihilation of Islamic Civilization.”

            Well a threat is not the same as an action.

            I actually said:
            “If the “moderate” Muslims want to preserve any parts of their religion, I think that we in the West must give them an ultimatum: if you don’t stop these insane practitioners of your so-called “peaceful” religion, we will do it for you, and there will be nothing left of it when we’re finished.

            That was the message to Japan in WWII, and that is what we need to do now with Islam. Nothing less than victory — meaning that we have to fight the war, the right war for the right reasons with the right goals, or this carnage will simply continue.”

            So at no point did I actually say, Lets nuke Islam NOW. I said lets give Islam an ultimatum.

            You said:
            “No one can take on Muslim warriors with boots on the ground. No one has and won. And no one ever will.”

            Right and no one could have taken Japan with boots on the ground either. Hence the ultimatum.

            So do you actually have an answer better than mine or do you have no solution at all. You just “pop-off” on message boards criticizing people with solutions while Parisians and Beruit-ians die in the streets.

            How easy is that for you. Does not take much thought at all does it to bolster the enemies spirits?

          • Standard Salvage

            Also, as to your assertion that:
            “Pakistan has full spectrum deterrence. Enough to take out the planet if need be.”

            Are you 100% sure that you are correct?
            http://lmgtfy.com/?q=pakistani+missiles+range

          • El Cid

            “Are you 100% sure that you are correct?”
            Yes. I don’t need your links signifying nothing. Been there. Done that.

            You take care now.
            I am done here.

          • Standard Salvage

            The truth does not mean anything to you? I guess no point in arguing with someone who denies facts.

            Remember, your the one replying to MY post so you do not get to decide when we are DONE here.

            Take care ad-hominem, denier of facts El Cid.

          • El Cid

            “Well a threat is not the same as an action.”
            In the adult rational world it is considered as such. Grow up and don’t make that mistake. You may be preempted.

          • Standard Salvage

            Pre-empted by what? See below. Pakistan has a limited range.

          • Standard Salvage

            Also, your argument may be a bit flawed. What is Pakistan’s Nuclear range exactly?

          • Standard Salvage

            El Cid? Cat got your tongue? You lost the argument miserably?

            You feel the need to criticize others while you offer no solutions?

            Are you just trying to “empathize” with ISIS?

            Also, as to your assertion that:
            “Pakistan has full spectrum deterrence. Enough to take out the planet if need be.”

            Are you 100% sure that you are correct?
            http://lmgtfy.com/?q=pakistani+missiles+range

            Do you actually have a point or just a hatred of yourself?
            A hatred of capitalism?

            What motivates you to criticize me but never criticize ISIS?

            Why do you put in more effort in fighting the friends of freedom than fighting the Islamic State savages?

          • El Cid

            “Cat got your tongue? You lost the argument miserably?”

            No, you have no argument. You are allover the place. And your attitude is offensive and rude. As I said you have no argument, lack knowledge, your IQ is low. You are too much of a troll with an oppressive inferiority complex to interest me.

            Once you are able to make an argument as an adult, able to focus your mind, I may consider your disjointed rants worthy of reply. Till then good day, take care.

            Peace be upon you.

          • Standard Salvage

            “No, you have no argument. You are allover the place”

            You are the one posting here trolling my comments. All while making weird claims like “Pakistan can nuke the planet” when you have no solution at all. Then you resort to ad hominem attacks while you accuse me of doing the same.

            Why don’t you look in the mirror as to who is being offensive and rude and acting like a child.

            Do you actually have a solution better than mine? My ultimatum. If not, stop criticizing others.

  • satyawadi

    100+ people killed in Paris Terrorist attack and all the western countries are shouting
    and abusing all Muslims while ISIL only is responsible for it. What about many hundreds of thousand muslims killed by American, French, British forces during their occupation of Iraq and when the truth came out their leaders simply said
    ” IT WAS A MISTAKE ” and as such the ISIL is the direct result of that mistake.

    • Standard Salvage

      How does blaming the West solve the problem today of Parisians being slaughtered in the streets?

      The Islamic State must be destroyed. They are evil and hate all human rights.

  • Munna

    Now is the time to start a campaign which says “No land rights to religion”. No religion should be given right to own a land as their own as this creates hatred for other religion and people. Religion can have a right to own land for the religious sites but in no way should religion be granted the whole landmass as belonging to them and to administer it based on some gobbledygook of Godly laws.